| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs i3-4160


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the i3-4160 gets 51.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
306c3
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
4.13k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
10.33k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
4.64k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
3.95k (x0.65)
TOTAL
31.39k
23.06k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-11400T

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
7.46k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
26.62k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
11.46k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
6.27k (x0.61)
TOTAL
67.1k
51.81k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
959 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
2869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1098 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
6405 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4