| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs i3-10110U


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 50.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
806ec
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
4.26k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
15.48k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
4.94k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
4.31k (x0.71)
TOTAL
31.39k
28.98k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-11400T

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
7.41k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
29.18k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
10.26k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
3.27k (x0.32)
TOTAL
67.1k
50.13k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1945 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
684 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
218 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
3342 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
3775 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
7068 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4