Core i5-11400T vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
810f81
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
175.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.78k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
16.42k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
4.75k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
5.51k (x0.91)
TOTAL
31.39k
30.46k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-11400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
15.18k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
74.87k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
27.85k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
6.08k (x0.59)
TOTAL
67.1k
123.97k (x1.85)
Performance/W
i5-11400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
3542 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
945 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
4105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
7615 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4