Core i5-11400T vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the 3200G gets 108 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the 3200G gets 108 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
810f81
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.89k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
17.94k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
5.34k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
6.62k (x1.09)
TOTAL
31.39k
33.79k (x1.08)
Multithread
i5-11400T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
15.07k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
66.84k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
19.56k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
6.54k (x0.64)
TOTAL
67.1k
108.01k (x1.61)
Performance/W
i5-11400T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
232 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
1662 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
4486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1654 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
8447 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4