| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 69.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
806c1
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.75k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
17.22k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
9.79k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
8.21k (x1.36)
TOTAL
31.39k
38.97k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-11400T

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
9.19k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
35.47k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
19.14k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
5.82k (x0.57)
TOTAL
67.1k
69.62k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
328 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
684 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
208 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
2487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
2387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
2003 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
9504 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4