Core i5-11400F vs i9-9900K
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
906ed
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
32.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
28.17k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
6.68k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
14.98k (x0.81)
TOTAL
88.34k
81.91k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-11400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
242.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
220.16k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
53.97k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
12.22k (x1.3)
TOTAL
495.65k
529.32k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4