| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a70f41
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Phoenix
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
32.74k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
27.35k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
14.23k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
27.41k (x1.48)
TOTAL
88.34k
101.73k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-11400F

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
236.69k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
202.63k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
102.8k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
11.28k (x1.2)
TOTAL
495.65k
553.41k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-11400F
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4