Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 4800U
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 4800U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
860f01
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
356.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
16.53k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
24.67k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
9.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
7.68k (x0.41)
TOTAL
88.34k
57.92k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-11400F
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
121.96k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
162.82k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
68.25k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
3.79k (x0.4)
TOTAL
495.65k
356.81k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
23788 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4