Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
800f82
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
15.75k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
26.29k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
5.91k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
18.48k (x1)
TOTAL
88.34k
66.44k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-11400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
94.49k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
182.53k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
45.95k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
10.15k (x1.08)
TOTAL
495.65k
333.12k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4