Core i5-11400 vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a50f00
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
23.29k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.89k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
11.75k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
24.83k (x1.37)
TOTAL
86.11k
85.76k (x1)
Multithread
i5-11400
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
138.16k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
192.12k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
80.84k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
9.93k (x1.26)
TOTAL
489.31k
421.05k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i5-11400
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4