| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400 vs i9-13900KF


Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 3.4 times faster than the i5-11400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
b0671
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
61.1k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
31.23k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
17.57k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
18.89k (x1.04)
TOTAL
86.11k
128.79k (x1.5)

Multithread

i5-11400

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
767.22k (x3.59)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
576.38k (x2.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
284.31k (x3.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
32.09k (x4.07)
TOTAL
489.31k
1660.01k (x3.39)

Performance/W
i5-11400
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4