| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400 vs i3-13100F


Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
b06f5
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
47.14k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.77k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
13.25k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
14.77k (x0.81)
TOTAL
86.11k
100.94k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-11400

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
168.51k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
142.8k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
63.57k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
15.34k (x1.94)
TOTAL
489.31k
390.23k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i5-11400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4