Core i5-11400 vs i3-1115G4
Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
806c1
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
24.25k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
21.63k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
9.09k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
7.23k (x0.4)
TOTAL
86.11k
62.19k (x0.72)
Multithread
i5-11400
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
56.9k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
55.68k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
19.29k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
6.09k (x0.77)
TOTAL
489.31k
137.96k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i5-11400
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4