| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8448 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.97k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
14.5k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
4.78k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
8.19k (x0.93)
TOTAL
39.34k
31.45k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
15.56k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
59.23k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
22.87k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
6.85k (x0.93)
TOTAL
101.16k
104.51k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
25.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
20.76k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.07k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
8.76k (x1.01)
TOTAL
68.08k
59.68k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
111.43k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
100.2k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
24.67k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
6.89k (x0.66)
TOTAL
237.55k
243.18k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4