| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50654
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
12.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
3.64k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
6.55k (x0.74)
TOTAL
39.34k
25.46k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
20.42k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
95.83k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
30.88k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
9.7k (x1.31)
TOTAL
101.16k
156.83k (x1.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
18.78k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
16.25k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
3.99k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
6.8k (x0.78)
TOTAL
68.08k
45.82k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
133.55k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
108.43k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
30.02k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
9.48k (x0.91)
TOTAL
237.55k
281.48k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4