Core i5-1135G7 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 141.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.1 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 141.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.1 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206c2
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
8.77k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
5.82k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
3.47k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
2.98k (x0.31)
TOTAL
56.64k
21.04k (x0.37)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
53.23k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
39.35k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
27.05k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
5.28k (x0.79)
TOTAL
141.4k
124.92k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1437 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2357 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1018 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5050 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3197 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2661 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2321 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
13486 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4