| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
13.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
11.91k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
4.83k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
3.83k (x0.41)
TOTAL
58.83k
33.68k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
105.42k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
109.99k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
44.56k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
17.7k (x2.47)
TOTAL
157.08k
277.66k (x1.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
20.99k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
11.9k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
4.72k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
3.75k (x0.43)
TOTAL
68.08k
41.36k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
172.62k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
110.03k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
44.06k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
16.93k (x1.62)
TOTAL
237.55k
343.64k (x1.45)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4