| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ed
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
5k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
20.22k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
6.54k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
13.78k (x1.56)
TOTAL
39.34k
45.53k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
36.39k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
166.55k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
54.92k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
8.96k (x1.21)
TOTAL
101.16k
266.82k (x2.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
18.03k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
25.98k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
6.86k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
14.5k (x1.49)
TOTAL
56.64k
65.37k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
131.34k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
204.76k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
55.74k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
8.99k (x1.35)
TOTAL
141.4k
400.83k (x2.83)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
17.98k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
27.04k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
6.63k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
13.6k (x1.44)
TOTAL
58.83k
65.24k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
130.88k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
208.5k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
54.12k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
8.91k (x1.24)
TOTAL
157.08k
402.41k (x2.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
32.08k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
28.17k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
6.68k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
14.98k (x1.72)
TOTAL
68.08k
81.91k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
242.98k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
220.16k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
53.97k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
12.22k (x1.17)
TOTAL
237.55k
529.32k (x2.23)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4