| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i9-10900X


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.7 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
28 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
19712 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
25.97k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
22.37k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.3k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
8.63k (x0.99)
TOTAL
68.08k
62.28k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
281.98k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
259.01k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
64.87k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
26.5k (x2.53)
TOTAL
237.55k
632.35k (x2.66)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4