| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i7-720QM


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-720QM is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 141.4 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
106e5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Clarksfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
38.78k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
1.49k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
3.4k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
1.95k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
2.08k (x0.24)
TOTAL
39.34k
8.92k (x0.23)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
4.23k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
11.4k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
7.17k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
4.51k (x0.61)
TOTAL
101.16k
27.32k (x0.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
5.49k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
3.55k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
2.01k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
2.09k (x0.21)
TOTAL
56.64k
13.13k (x0.23)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
15.06k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
12.15k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
7.18k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
4.39k (x0.66)
TOTAL
141.4k
38.78k (x0.27)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
1437 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2357 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1018 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
5050 points/W
862 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
3197 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2661 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2321 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
13486 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4