| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i7-2600


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 157.1 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
206a7
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
93.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
10.03k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
8.91k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
4.34k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
5.41k (x0.58)
TOTAL
58.83k
28.68k (x0.49)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
37.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
34.22k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
17.65k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
4.13k (x0.58)
TOTAL
157.08k
93.69k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1632 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2658 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1064 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
256 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
5610 points/W
986 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3600 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5571 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2595 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2242 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
14007 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4