| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i7-10610U


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806ec
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
23.1k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
20k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
4.61k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
8.94k (x1.03)
TOTAL
68.08k
56.65k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
73.36k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
68.28k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
13.73k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
6.62k (x0.63)
TOTAL
237.55k
162k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4