| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a40f41
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Rembrandt
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
21.04k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
22.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
10.21k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
24.27k (x2.79)
TOTAL
68.08k
77.93k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
158.65k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
215.86k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
89.45k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
14.77k (x1.41)
TOTAL
237.55k
478.73k (x2.02)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4