| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
15.96k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
4.69k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
17.42k (x1.98)
TOTAL
39.34k
41.47k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
20.88k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
110.37k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
39.25k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
6.66k (x0.9)
TOTAL
101.16k
177.16k (x1.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
13.76k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
23.03k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.12k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
15.23k (x1.75)
TOTAL
68.08k
57.13k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
83.23k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
161.06k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
40.52k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
6.73k (x0.64)
TOTAL
237.55k
291.53k (x1.23)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4