| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
15.09k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
23.74k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
8.32k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
5.19k (x0.6)
TOTAL
68.08k
52.35k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
67k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
89.94k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
36.84k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
4.6k (x0.44)
TOTAL
237.55k
198.38k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4