Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-12400F
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
7.43k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
18.64k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
13.15k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
14.82k (x1.68)
TOTAL
39.34k
54.04k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
36.23k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
134.76k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
84.06k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
16.71k (x2.26)
TOTAL
101.16k
271.76k (x2.69)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
24.18k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
23.85k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
14.42k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
14.87k (x1.53)
TOTAL
56.64k
77.32k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
122.98k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
168.77k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
96.11k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
16.32k (x2.45)
TOTAL
141.4k
404.19k (x2.86)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
24.24k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
24.74k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
13.95k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
14.47k (x1.54)
TOTAL
58.83k
77.41k (x1.32)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
126.87k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
186.48k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
92.37k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
15.45k (x2.16)
TOTAL
157.08k
421.18k (x2.68)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
33.85k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
20.33k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
10.51k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
11.77k (x1.35)
TOTAL
68.08k
76.46k (x1.12)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
174.21k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
141.31k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
64.86k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
19.01k (x1.81)
TOTAL
237.55k
399.39k (x1.68)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4