| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i3-12100F


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
39.54k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
23.79k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
11.96k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
13.52k (x1.55)
TOTAL
68.08k
88.81k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
148k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
123.08k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
52.73k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
16.67k (x1.59)
TOTAL
237.55k
340.49k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4