| | | | | | |

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
311.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
16.86k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
12.08k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
3.37k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
6.29k (x1.24)
TOTAL
63.64k
38.61k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-11300H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
150.99k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
118.54k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
33.44k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
8.6k (x1.43)
TOTAL
285.75k
311.57k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i5-11300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4