Core i5-11300H vs i7-6900K
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
23.11k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
17.84k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
5.34k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
3.47k (x0.69)
TOTAL
63.64k
49.76k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-11300H
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
184.19k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
181.2k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
47.44k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
14.69k (x2.45)
TOTAL
285.75k
427.51k (x1.5)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4