Core i5-11300H vs Ryzen 3 5300U
Description
The i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.4 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11300H gets a score of 285.8 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 1.4 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f81
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
63.64k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
285.75k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11300H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.83k
15.09k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.56k
23.74k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.2k
8.32k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
5.19k (x1.03)
TOTAL
63.64k
52.35k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-11300H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
116.87k
67k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
121.08k
89.94k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.8k
36.84k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
6k
4.6k (x0.77)
TOTAL
285.75k
198.38k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i5-11300H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3339 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3459 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1194 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
171 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
8164 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11300H
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5870 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2090 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1149 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
14465 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4