| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8448 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.97k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
14.5k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.78k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.19k (x1)
TOTAL
38.97k
31.45k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
15.56k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
59.23k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
22.87k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
6.85k (x1.18)
TOTAL
69.62k
104.51k (x1.5)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
25.09k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.76k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.07k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
8.76k (x1.21)
TOTAL
62.19k
59.68k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
111.43k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
100.2k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
24.67k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.89k (x1.13)
TOTAL
137.96k
243.18k (x1.76)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4