| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50654
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
12.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
3.64k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.55k (x0.8)
TOTAL
38.97k
25.46k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
20.42k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
95.83k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
30.88k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
9.7k (x1.67)
TOTAL
69.62k
156.83k (x2.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
18.78k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
16.25k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
3.99k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
6.8k (x0.94)
TOTAL
62.19k
45.82k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
133.55k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
108.43k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
30.02k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
9.48k (x1.56)
TOTAL
137.96k
281.48k (x2.04)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4