Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
106a5
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
7.51k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
4.93k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
3.02k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.74k (x0.34)
TOTAL
53.19k
18.2k (x0.34)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
31.33k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
23.11k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
15.78k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
2.55k (x0.44)
TOTAL
101.38k
72.77k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4