| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 101.4 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 2.7 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
506e3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
37.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
0.7k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
2.8k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
0.85k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
1.88k (x0.23)
TOTAL
38.97k
6.23k (x0.16)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
2.74k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
12.87k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
3.89k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
6.03k (x1.04)
TOTAL
69.62k
25.52k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
2.59k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
3.94k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
1k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2k (x0.24)
TOTAL
53.19k
9.52k (x0.18)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
10.4k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
16.64k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
4.51k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
6.33k (x1.1)
TOTAL
101.38k
37.88k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1082 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1612 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
720 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
206 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
3621 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
3147 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2616 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1991 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4