Core i3-1115G4 vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.9 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.9 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
406e3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
10.24k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
15.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
2.97k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.32k (x0.66)
TOTAL
54.18k
33.86k (x0.62)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
16.78k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
25.09k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
6.14k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.58k (x0.99)
TOTAL
100.87k
53.58k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1555 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
699 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
200 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
3602 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5262 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1956 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
13214 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4