Core i3-1115G4 vs i9-10900X
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 4.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 4.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/20
TDP
28 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
19712 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
25.97k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.37k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.3k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
8.63k (x1.19)
TOTAL
62.19k
62.28k (x1)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
281.98k (x4.96)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
259.01k (x4.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
64.87k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
26.5k (x4.35)
TOTAL
137.96k
632.35k (x4.58)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4