Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-4765T
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
134.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
15.61k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
8.8k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
3.58k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
3.33k (x0.46)
TOTAL
62.19k
31.31k (x0.5)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
66k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
43.27k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
17.39k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
7.88k (x1.29)
TOTAL
137.96k
134.53k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4