Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-2600
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 100.9 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206a7
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
93.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
10.03k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
8.91k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
4.34k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.41k (x0.68)
TOTAL
54.18k
28.68k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
37.69k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
34.22k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
17.65k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.13k (x0.74)
TOTAL
100.87k
93.69k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1555 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
699 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
200 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
3602 points/W
986 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3573 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5262 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1956 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
13214 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4