| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.41k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
14.14k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
4.41k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.87k (x1.08)
TOTAL
38.97k
30.83k (x0.79)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
12.75k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
52.88k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
16.25k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
8.98k (x1.54)
TOTAL
69.62k
90.85k (x1.3)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
11.71k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
16.74k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
4.27k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
7.81k (x0.96)
TOTAL
53.19k
40.53k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
44.38k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
62.55k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
15.6k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
7.85k (x1.36)
TOTAL
101.38k
130.38k (x1.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
11.59k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
17.89k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
4.14k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
7.88k (x0.98)
TOTAL
54.18k
41.5k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
44.42k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
67.5k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
14.6k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
8.06k (x1.44)
TOTAL
100.87k
134.58k (x1.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
21.65k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
19.18k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.38k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
8.3k (x1.15)
TOTAL
62.19k
53.51k (x0.86)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
77.12k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
68.68k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
15.24k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
7.78k (x1.28)
TOTAL
137.96k
168.81k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4