Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-10400
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
27.46k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
24.28k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.65k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
11.92k (x1.65)
TOTAL
62.19k
69.31k (x1.11)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
165.5k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
156.32k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
39.88k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
5.96k (x0.98)
TOTAL
137.96k
367.65k (x2.66)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4