Core i3-1115G4 vs i3-10100
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.74k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.31k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
7.65k (x1.06)
TOTAL
62.19k
55.41k (x0.89)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
71.95k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
67.7k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
16.43k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6.25k (x1.03)
TOTAL
137.96k
162.33k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4