Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 6.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 6.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a20f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
24.34k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.8k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
12.12k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
26.55k (x3.67)
TOTAL
62.19k
89.82k (x1.44)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
263.12k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
353.9k (x6.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
159.07k (x8.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
64.01k (x10.51)
TOTAL
137.96k
840.11k (x6.09)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4