Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 3.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 3.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.47k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
17.41k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
8.23k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
25.15k (x3.06)
TOTAL
38.97k
55.26k (x1.42)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
36.1k (x3.93)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
178.65k (x5.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
95.98k (x5.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
16.03k (x2.75)
TOTAL
69.62k
326.76k (x4.69)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
17.17k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
25.32k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
8.36k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
27.86k (x3.41)
TOTAL
53.19k
78.71k (x1.48)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
136.06k (x4.49)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
195.06k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
97.81k (x4.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
12.91k (x2.24)
TOTAL
101.38k
441.85k (x4.36)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
16.76k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
25.16k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
8.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
24.3k (x3.03)
TOTAL
54.18k
74.98k (x1.38)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
131.36k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
198.51k (x4.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
97.27k (x4.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
13.4k (x2.39)
TOTAL
100.87k
440.54k (x4.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
17.1k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.59k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
8.91k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
23.21k (x3.21)
TOTAL
62.19k
75.81k (x1.22)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
172.04k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
214.03k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
97.1k (x5.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
14.57k (x2.39)
TOTAL
137.96k
497.74k (x3.61)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4