Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 3.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 3.5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
16.77k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
26.29k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
8.79k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
22.51k (x3.11)
TOTAL
62.19k
74.35k (x1.2)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
167.94k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
209.85k (x3.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
94.41k (x4.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
11.27k (x1.85)
TOTAL
137.96k
483.47k (x3.5)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4