Core i3-1115G4 vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200G is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
13.75k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.58k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.99k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
3.55k (x0.49)
TOTAL
62.19k
44.87k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
50.99k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
84.4k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
18.95k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
3.2k (x0.53)
TOTAL
137.96k
157.54k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4