Core i3-1115G4 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
13.02k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
4.81k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
5.43k (x0.75)
TOTAL
62.19k
43.82k (x0.7)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
27.29k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
49.37k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
13.57k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
5.61k (x0.92)
TOTAL
137.96k
95.84k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4