| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-1185G7


Description
Both models i3-1115G4 and i7-1185G7 are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806c1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
24.35k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
20.07k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
8.61k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
7.84k (x1.08)
TOTAL
62.19k
60.87k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
93.58k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
94.71k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
33.28k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
9.34k (x1.53)
TOTAL
137.96k
230.91k (x1.67)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4