| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-11700


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 5.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
5.48k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
20.99k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
12.58k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
21.24k (x2.59)
TOTAL
38.97k
60.28k (x1.55)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
44.15k (x4.8)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
196.6k (x5.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
102.57k (x5.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
10.64k (x1.83)
TOTAL
69.62k
353.96k (x5.08)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
18.05k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
26.13k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
13.92k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
21.22k (x2.6)
TOTAL
53.19k
79.32k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
160.49k (x5.3)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
225.25k (x4.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
113.88k (x5.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
10.64k (x1.84)
TOTAL
101.38k
510.25k (x5.03)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
18.96k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
28.34k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
13.26k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
20.2k (x2.52)
TOTAL
54.18k
80.76k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
164.31k (x5.11)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
253.96k (x5.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
115.28k (x5.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
10.65k (x1.9)
TOTAL
100.87k
544.2k (x5.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
35.12k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
29.24k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
12.56k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
21.95k (x3.03)
TOTAL
62.19k
98.87k (x1.59)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
304k (x5.34)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
304.7k (x5.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
109.64k (x5.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
10.64k (x1.75)
TOTAL
137.96k
728.98k (x5.28)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4