| | | | | | |

Core i3-1115G4 vs i5-11400T


Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 69.6 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.51k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
14.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
7.63k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.06k (x0.74)
TOTAL
38.97k
31.39k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-1115G4

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
7.4k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
31.37k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
18.11k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
10.23k (x1.76)
TOTAL
69.62k
67.1k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
328 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
684 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
208 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
2487 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4199 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2387 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2003 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
9504 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4