| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 885.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 3.7 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
b0671
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
4/8
24/32
TDP
28 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
36864 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
110.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
885.37k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
53.97k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
28.92k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
12.85k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
15.25k (x0.97)
TOTAL
82.77k
110.99k (x1.34)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
374.2k (x3.88)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
331.24k (x3.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
164.06k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
15.87k (x1.04)
TOTAL
239.58k
885.37k (x3.7)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
6804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
6023 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
2983 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
289 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
16098 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
9994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2825 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
20553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4